Serum cystatin C and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in predicting the severity of coronary artery disease in diabetic patients
1Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Başkent University Ankara Education and Research Hospital, Ankara- Turkey
Anatol J Cardiol 2016; 10(16): 756-761 PubMed ID: 27182610 PMCID: 5324935 DOI: 10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2015.6645
Full Text PDF

Abstract

Objective: Cystatin C and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) are biomarkers of renal functions. We evaluated their roles in predicting the severity of coronary artery disease (CAD).
Materials and Methods: Fifty-two consecutive type 2 diabetic patients (32 males, 65.7±8.6 years) who underwent coronary angiography (CAG) for stable CAD were included in this single-center, prospective, cross-sectional study. Patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and with a history of by-pass surgery and/or coronary stent implantation were excluded. The vessel score and Gensini score were calculated to assess the presence and severity of CAD. Mann–Whitney U test, Spearman test, and multiple linear regression analysis were used for the main statistical analyses.
Results: Serum cystatin C levels were higher in patients with multivessel disease than in those with single vessel disease [1260 ng/mL (953–1640) vs. 977 ng/mL (599–1114), p=0.017]. According to the median Gensini score, the higher score group also had higher cystatin C levels than the lower score group [1114 ng/mL (948–1567) vs. 929 ng/mL (569–1156), p=0.009]. However, serum NGAL levels were similar between these subgroups. There was a positive correlation between cystatin C and Gensini score (r=0.334, p=0.016). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed serum cystatin C as an independent predictor of the Gensini score (β=0.360, t=2.311, p=0.026). These results may aid in defining cystatin C as a surrogate marker of the extent of CAD in further clinical trials.
Conclusion: Serum Cystatin C, but not NGAL levels, could predict the severity of CAD in diabetic patients. (Anatol J Cardiol 2016; 16: 756-61)