2Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Bakırçay University, İzmir, Türkiye
3Department of Family Medicine, University of Health Sciences, İzmir, Türkiye
4Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Central Hospital, İzmir, Türkiye
5Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Başkent, İzmir, Türkiye
6University of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, İzmir, Türkiye
7Department of Cardiology, Central Hospital, İzmir, Türkiye
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a new artificial intelligence model, the compact unified model (CU-Model), for moderate-to-severe carotid artery stenosis using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) images compared to clinical reference standards.
Methods: In this retrospective multicenter study, 156 patients with confirmed moderate-to-severe carotid artery stenosis were included. A pretrained CU-Model (trained on public non-clinical datasets for optical flow and stereo matching) was applied to raw DSA images without any fine-tuning on clinical data to avoid data leakage. The model served exclusively as a post-acquisition support tool: cardiologists applied it immediately after procedures for automated vessel segmentation and highlighting. Final North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) measurements and interpreta-tions were performed manually under expert supervision by 2 blinded researchers.
Results: The CU-Model identified left internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis in 84 patients and right ICA stenosis in 72. It misclassified only 1 moderate left ICA stenosis case as normal, achieving 99.4% sensitivity (155/156) for any stenosis detection. For stenosis severity
grading, strong agreement with DSA was observed (moderate: 57.68 ± 5.94 vs. 57.71 ± 6.19, r = 0.83, P < .001, 95% CI: 0.76-0.88; severe: 86.96 ± 5.97 vs. 87.02 ± 6.18, r = 0.91, P < .001, 95% CI: 0.85-0.95). Of 156 cases, 106 were moderate (50%-69%) and 50 severe (≥70%), using NASCET-adapted thresholds accounting for measurement variability. Hypertension (77%), smoking, and syncope were common, with significant association in symptomatic
patients (P < .05).
Conclusion: The CU-Model demonstrates strong concordance with DSA as a practical, post-procedure support tool for vessel segmentation. Pending larger validation studies, it shows promise for enhancing clinical workflow efficiency.