CONTENT
A 75-year-old man was admitted to the intensive care unit due to pulmonary edema. His medical history included a previous coronary artery bypass surgery, and a stent was implanted in the left iliofemoral artery due to peripheral artery disease. He has been on hemodialysis twice a week due to chronic renal failure for 10 years. Appropriate medical therapy and frequent hemodialysis resolved the shortness of breath and pulmonary edema. The echocardiographic examination revealed severe calcific aortic stenosis; the aortic valve area was calculated as 0.6 cm2 with the continuity equation, and the mean aortic gradient was measured as 60 mm Hg.
Because of high surgical risk (Euroscore 2: 18) and the previous history of coronary artery bypass surgery, it was decided to perform transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for the treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis.
Preoperative aortic angio CT revealed an annulus perimeter of 78.5 mm and an annular area of 510 mm2 (
After informed consent was signed with the patient and relatives, the patient was taken to the cath lab to perform TAVI. The right external iliac artery route was decided as the most appropriate TAVI intervention site. Puncture was performed under ultrasound and CT fusion guidance (
Current guidelines recommend the transfemoral route as the entry site for TAVI, and the transaxillary route for unsuitable femoral anatomy.1 In our case, the transfemoral intervention could not be used because the right femoral artery was completely occluded, and there was a stent in the left femoral artery which had a very narrow diameter due to significant restenosis. The axillary routes were also inappropriate because of the unfavorable angle between the right subclavian artery and the aorta, and there was a hemodialysis fistula in the left arm. Considering all of the above-mentioned factors, the transiliac route was ought to be preferred.
Since the external iliac artery lies between the transverse fascia and the iliopectineal fascia, puncture and sheath placement in this area is very difficult and may cause retroperitoneal bleeding through this funnel.2 Therefore, it is not recommended as a puncture site. In our case, the puncture was performed with the help of new techniques such as Doppler ultrasound and CT fusion, and hemostasis was achieved with ProGlide after procedure.
In our literature research, we found that in one case, transiliac TAVI was performed with surgical cutdown.3 To the best of knowledge, this case is the first complete percutaneous transiliac TAVI case.
Footnotes
References
- Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease: developed by the Task Force for the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2022;75(6):524-.
- Raphael M, Hartnell G. Femoral artery catheterization and retroperitoneal haematoma formation. Clin Radiol. 2001;56(11):933-935.
- Kainuma S, Kuratani T, Shimamura K. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: first trans-iliac experience in Japan. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;59(4):273-276.