2Department of Cardiology, Sincan Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
3Department of Public Health, University of Health Sciences, Gülhane School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye
CONTENT
To the Editor,
We sincerely thank the reader
We agree that the distinction between augmentation index (AIx) and direct measures of arterial stiffness, particularly pulse wave velocity (PWV), is important. AIx is influenced by wave reflection, vascular tone, and heart rate, and therefore, should not be interpreted as a pure measure of intrinsic arterial wall stiffness.3,
As correctly noted, PWV did not change significantly, whereas AIx and AIx@75 increased at the 30th minute. We agree that these findings are more consistent with a short-term hemodynamic or functional vascular response than with persistent structural changes in the arterial wall. We appreciate the opportunity to clarify this point.
We also acknowledge the absence of a placebo or control beverage arm as an important limitation. Our study was designed as a single-arm, repeated-measures pilot study to assess the acute vascular response to energy drink consumption under standardized conditions in healthy young adults. Therefore, our findings should be interpreted with caution, and future placebo-controlled studies are needed to better distinguish the specific effects of energy drinks from nonspecific time-dependent or volume-related influences.
Regarding the decrease in total vascular resistance and diastolic blood pressure at the second hour, we believe this does not necessarily contradict the earlier increase in AIx. Rather, these findings may reflect the dynamic and time-dependent nature of the vascular and autonomic response after energy drink intake. Previous literature suggests that energy drinks and their constituents may produce complex and temporally variable cardiovascular responses rather than a single uniform physiological effect.
In summary, we agree that our findings should not be interpreted as evidence of acute fixed arterial stiffening in the structural sense. However, the observed transient increase in AIx and AIx@75 still supports the presence of an acute vascular functional response following energy drink consumption.
We thank the authors once again for their valuable comments and for the opportunity to clarify the interpretation of our results.
Footnotes
References
- Kayıhan K. Stiffness or Reflection? A Critical Appraisal of Energy Drink–Induced Vascular Changes. Anatol J Cardiol. 2026;30(8):547-548.
- Yaşar S, Geneş M, Eravcı Ö. Evaluating the acute effects of energy drink consumption on arterial stiffness in healthy young adults. Anatol J Cardiol. 2025;29(10):564-570.
- Heusinkveld MHG, Delhaas T, Lumens J. Augmentation index is not a proxy for wave reflection magnitude: mechanistic analysis using a computational model. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2019;127(2):491-500.
- Wilkinson IB, MacCallum H, Flint L, Cockcroft JR, Newby DE, Webb DJ. The influence of heart rate on augmentation index and central arterial pressure in humans. J Physiol. 2000;525(1):263-270.
- Townsend RR, Wilkinson IB, Schiffrin EL. Recommendations for improving and standardizing vascular research on arterial stiffness: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2015;66(3):698-722.
- Stopa M, Łobacz M, Niemczyk M. Influence of energy drinks on acute hemodynamic parameters in young healthy adults: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover pilot study. Kardiol Pol. 2020;78(4):335-337.
- Grasser EK, Miles-Chan JL, Charrière N, Loonam CR, Dulloo AG, Montani JP. Energy drinks and their impact on the cardiovascular system: potential mechanisms. Adv Nutr. 2016;7(5):950-960.